Last week I received this email from a teacher in our district:
I need some advice! Since January is pretty much a wash for instruction, and ISTEP is looming near, how would you suggest I most effectively prepare my students for ISTEP? (A big question I know!) Here is my dilemma…I do NOT want to just focus on test prep for 4-6 weeks. That’s boring! I’ve always wondered why teachers are told to differentiate instruction and then kids are assessed with a standardized test. Makes absolutely no sense to me! I don’t just want to teach to the test…that’s not why I became a teacher. I don’t want to give up authentic teaching for test prep activities, but that being said, I know I will be evaluated on how my kids do.
I guess I just wanted to pick your brain on test prep…
This passionate teacher is fairly new in her teaching career (brand new to teaching in our district), but has worked in education for a long time. I love working with her. She’s passionate, she’s enthusiastic, she’s a self-initiated learner, and she loves her students. That being said, I don’t think she’s the only teacher to face the dilemma about test prep. Here was my email response to her:
I am highly anti-test prep as research has shown that it does not increase performance. I do believe in exposing students to the types of questions and tasks they will encounter on tests, though. I think if you keep teaching the standards in authentic and engaging ways, then your students will be prepared for ISTEP regardless if you spend the next 4-6 weeks in the test prep books. My opinion… Keep doing what you know is best practices for your students.
Which brings me to her original question, if we want to educate students based on their personal needs, why do we [typically government officials] continue to insist we assess them with a one-size-fits-all standardized test?